Greenhouse vs Workable
ats comparison · Updated June 2026
Greenhouse
ats · enterprise
Structured hiring platform for growing companies
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Greenhouse | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Category | ats | ats |
| Pricing Model | enterprise | paid |
| Price Range | Enterprise (contact sales) | $149-$299/mo |
| Free Tier | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| Target Market | Enterprise | SMB / Mid-market |
| Affiliate Program | ✗ No | ✗ No |
In-Depth Look
Greenhouse
Enterprise hiring platform emphasizing structured interviewing and DEI. AI-powered sourcing, candidate scorecards, interview kits, offer approvals, and onboarding. Used by Airbnb, HubSpot, and Cisco.
Visit Greenhouse →Workable
All-in-one recruiting and HR platform with AI-sourcing, applicant tracking, employee management, and HRIS. AI candidate recommendations from 400M+ profiles, automated screening, and offer management.
Visit Workable →Used by These Professions
The Bottom Line
Both Greenhouse and Workable are strong options in the ats space. Neither offers a free tier, so request demos from both to evaluate which fits your workflow.
Greenhouse is designed for enterprise teams with complex requirements, while Workable is better suited for SMBs and mid-market companies.
The best choice depends on your team size, budget, and specific workflow requirements. We recommend trying Greenhouse first, then evaluating Workable if it doesn't meet your needs.