Teamwork.com vs Wrike
project management comparison · Updated June 2026
Teamwork.com
project management · freemium
Client work management for agencies and professional services
Wrike
project management · paid
Enterprise work management with AI-powered project intelligence
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Teamwork.com | Wrike |
|---|---|---|
| Category | project management | project management |
| Pricing Model | freemium | paid |
| Price Range | Free-$18/user/mo | $10-$25/user/mo |
| Free Tier | ✓ Yes | ✗ No |
| Target Market | SMB / Mid-market | SMB / Mid-market |
| Affiliate Program | ✗ No | ✗ No |
In-Depth Look
Teamwork.com
Project management built for client-facing teams. Time tracking, budgeting, resource planning, client portals, and profitability reporting. AI task suggestions and workload balancing for agencies and consultancies.
Visit Teamwork.com →Wrike
Enterprise work management platform with AI project risk prediction, resource planning, time tracking, and cross-functional collaboration. Wrike AI handles status reports, action items, and document summarization.
Visit Wrike →Used by These Professions
The Bottom Line
Both Teamwork.com and Wrike are strong options in the project management space. Teamwork.com offers a free tier, making it a better starting point for smaller teams or individual professionals who want to test before committing.
Both are accessible to SMB and mid-market teams with transparent pricing.
The best choice depends on your team size, budget, and specific workflow requirements. We recommend trying Teamwork.com first, then evaluating Wrike if it doesn't meet your needs.